<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting paid for results, not services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/24/getting-paid-for-results-not-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/24/getting-paid-for-results-not-services/</link>
	<description>personal blog of Aaron Mentele, web developer and partner at Electric Pulp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 06:48:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The culture of small at charisma:18</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/24/getting-paid-for-results-not-services/comment-page-1/#comment-7825</link>
		<dc:creator>The culture of small at charisma:18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 05:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2006/12/24/getting-paid-for-results-not-services/#comment-7825</guid>
		<description>[...] This is a situation that sneaks up on you. One day you think you build websites, and the next, you realize you&#8217;re supporting systems that clients rely on to keep their business running. If you don&#8217;t have sufficient redundancy, this should make you very nervous. Redundancy belies small (in the bad sense) but doesn&#8217;t make you big (in the bad sense.) Redundancy means you can take on big clients. Redundancy means you can support revenue shares. Redundancy means you can go to Mexico for the week. Just make sure you&#8217;re plugging in monsters and not villagers. Redundancy does not mean you have someone at the office that can call your cell if there&#8217;s a problem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a situation that sneaks up on you. One day you think you build websites, and the next, you realize you&#8217;re supporting systems that clients rely on to keep their business running. If you don&#8217;t have sufficient redundancy, this should make you very nervous. Redundancy belies small (in the bad sense) but doesn&#8217;t make you big (in the bad sense.) Redundancy means you can take on big clients. Redundancy means you can support revenue shares. Redundancy means you can go to Mexico for the week. Just make sure you&#8217;re plugging in monsters and not villagers. Redundancy does not mean you have someone at the office that can call your cell if there&#8217;s a problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beck</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/24/getting-paid-for-results-not-services/comment-page-1/#comment-6802</link>
		<dc:creator>Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2006/12/24/getting-paid-for-results-not-services/#comment-6802</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s the first I&#039;ve ever heard a reference to &quot;The Dark Crystal&quot;. Nice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s the first I&#8217;ve ever heard a reference to &#8220;The Dark Crystal&#8221;. Nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mentele</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/24/getting-paid-for-results-not-services/comment-page-1/#comment-6024</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2006/12/24/getting-paid-for-results-not-services/#comment-6024</guid>
		<description>Number 2! (Usually.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 2! (Usually.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Schock</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/24/getting-paid-for-results-not-services/comment-page-1/#comment-6023</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Schock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2006/12/24/getting-paid-for-results-not-services/#comment-6023</guid>
		<description>Two scenarios for you:

1. The designer of the Nike Swoosh was paid by the hour and made a total of $35.

2. The person who created the Jingle for the game show Jeopardy licensed the work and has made $70-80 million.

This is a tough question: how would you rather work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two scenarios for you:</p>
<p>1. The designer of the Nike Swoosh was paid by the hour and made a total of $35.</p>
<p>2. The person who created the Jingle for the game show Jeopardy licensed the work and has made $70-80 million.</p>
<p>This is a tough question: how would you rather work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
