<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: hAtom and featured content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/</link>
	<description>personal blog of Aaron Mentele, web developer and partner at Electric Pulp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 04:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mentele</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7820</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/#comment-7820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent.  Thanks for the link - I&#039;ll check it out.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now that I&#039;ve checked it out, I have a couple of comments.  First, the article was posted more than four years ago.  Even though the article is loosing its relevance, I agree with several points in his post.  Personally, I don&#039;t see hAtom as a way to replace RSS.  I see it as an alternative.  And, if it&#039;s an alternative, it should have some distinguishing features.  Featured content and visual metadata would be two that I think would fit well.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent.  Thanks for the link &#8211; I&#8217;ll check it out.
</p>
<p>Now that I&#8217;ve checked it out, I have a couple of comments.  First, the article was posted more than four years ago.  Even though the article is loosing its relevance, I agree with several points in his post.  Personally, I don&#8217;t see hAtom as a way to replace RSS.  I see it as an alternative.  And, if it&#8217;s an alternative, it should have some distinguishing features.  Featured content and visual metadata would be two that I think would fit well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Janes</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7819</link>
		<dc:creator>David Janes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/#comment-7819</guid>
		<description>Ah. If you think there&#039;s a sufficient case, just open a page on the microformats wiki and start documenting examples; it&#039;s easy enough to be additive to hAtom.

There&#039;s been plenty of talk in past about HTML-based syndication and it&#039;s generally been though to be a bad idea. This (http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/11/26/syndication_is_not_publication) is considered to be the seminal post about the topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. If you think there&#8217;s a sufficient case, just open a page on the microformats wiki and start documenting examples; it&#8217;s easy enough to be additive to hAtom.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s been plenty of talk in past about HTML-based syndication and it&#8217;s generally been though to be a bad idea. This (<a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/11/26/syndication_is_not_publication" rel="nofollow">http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/11/26/syndication_is_not_publication</a>) is considered to be the seminal post about the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mentele</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7800</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/#comment-7800</guid>
		<description>Hey David.  I wrote that it has no way to &lt;b&gt;differentiate&lt;/b&gt; posts, not no way to identify posts (if you look, you&#039;ll see that this blog uses the format.)  I agree with you that hAtom doesn&#039;t provide a new way of doing feeds.  That&#039;s the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey David.  I wrote that it has no way to <b>differentiate</b> posts, not no way to identify posts (if you look, you&#8217;ll see that this blog uses the format.)  I agree with you that hAtom doesn&#8217;t provide a new way of doing feeds.  That&#8217;s the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Janes</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7799</link>
		<dc:creator>David Janes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/#comment-7799</guid>
		<description>&quot;hentry&quot; distinguishes individual entries within a feed and is the primary way hAtom is used. The intention of hAtom is not to provide a new way of doing feeds but to identify semantic content commonly associated with blog posts; it takes the name Atom as we used that to name elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;hentry&#8221; distinguishes individual entries within a feed and is the primary way hAtom is used. The intention of hAtom is not to provide a new way of doing feeds but to identify semantic content commonly associated with blog posts; it takes the name Atom as we used that to name elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visual metadata in feeds at charisma:18</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7044</link>
		<dc:creator>Visual metadata in feeds at charisma:18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2006/12/26/hatom-and-featured-content/#comment-7044</guid>
		<description>[...] As I&#8217;ve written before, hAtom could gain fans by including some post metadata. Adding [visual] metadata for the entire feed would be one more cheering point to those of us that still see benefit in the &#8220;visual Internet.&#8221;  Technorati Tags:     Tags: No Tags &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I&#8217;ve written before, hAtom could gain fans by including some post metadata. Adding [visual] metadata for the entire feed would be one more cheering point to those of us that still see benefit in the &#8220;visual Internet.&#8221;  Technorati Tags:     Tags: No Tags | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

