<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good, fast and cheap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronmentele.com/2007/01/21/good-fast-and-cheap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/01/21/good-fast-and-cheap/</link>
	<description>personal blog of Aaron Mentele, web developer and partner at Electric Pulp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 04:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mentele</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/01/21/good-fast-and-cheap/comment-page-1/#comment-8767</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/01/21/good-fast-and-cheap/#comment-8767</guid>
		<description>Hello JG - I swear I already left a response to this - I must be going crazy.  I think it went something like this: 
I understand and fear the triangle in the world offline.  Online I think there are efficiencies that can help you with good and fast.  In those cases, price is a variable.  We have a client that refers to licensing technology as selling air.  I agree with at least half of his theory.  But there&#039;s probably a whole post coming on this thought soon.
Thanks for stopping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello JG &#8211; I swear I already left a response to this &#8211; I must be going crazy.  I think it went something like this:<br />
I understand and fear the triangle in the world offline.  Online I think there are efficiencies that can help you with good and fast.  In those cases, price is a variable.  We have a client that refers to licensing technology as selling air.  I agree with at least half of his theory.  But there&#8217;s probably a whole post coming on this thought soon.<br />
Thanks for stopping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/01/21/good-fast-and-cheap/comment-page-1/#comment-8671</link>
		<dc:creator>JG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/01/21/good-fast-and-cheap/#comment-8671</guid>
		<description>I use the triangle every day.  We run a studio for inside another company.  People want things al the time from use, and a lot that are outside our scope.  It has become a place to start most discussions with any project.  I can do anything for them, but how do they want it?  My company ties my hands and their company ties their hands.  I cannot untie my knot until they untie theirs.  If they want something great and fast, I can through people and resources at it (thus making it expensive).  If they have the time, I can do it in my downtime (thus making it very inexpensive). 

I don&#039;t like to us it, but it gives people a reality to work inside.  With all the tools available today, regular people think production work is easy and fast.  Most cases, it is not.  I like to reference another type of job when I give them the triangle.  If you want you car fixed today so you can leave on a trip, it will be expensive.  If you can wait a week, it will be less expensive. 

It&#039;s true, how many nights can you work and for how much?  I&#039;ll spend two hours with an Easy-Bake oven making not so easy Cin-a-buns with my daughter, but how long will I spend on a project that does not leave me the time or resources to make the Easy-Bake-athon happen.

I&#039;ll put &quot;Built to Last&quot; on the need to read list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the triangle every day.  We run a studio for inside another company.  People want things al the time from use, and a lot that are outside our scope.  It has become a place to start most discussions with any project.  I can do anything for them, but how do they want it?  My company ties my hands and their company ties their hands.  I cannot untie my knot until they untie theirs.  If they want something great and fast, I can through people and resources at it (thus making it expensive).  If they have the time, I can do it in my downtime (thus making it very inexpensive). </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like to us it, but it gives people a reality to work inside.  With all the tools available today, regular people think production work is easy and fast.  Most cases, it is not.  I like to reference another type of job when I give them the triangle.  If you want you car fixed today so you can leave on a trip, it will be expensive.  If you can wait a week, it will be less expensive. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true, how many nights can you work and for how much?  I&#8217;ll spend two hours with an Easy-Bake oven making not so easy Cin-a-buns with my daughter, but how long will I spend on a project that does not leave me the time or resources to make the Easy-Bake-athon happen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll put &#8220;Built to Last&#8221; on the need to read list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

