<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia looking for financing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronmentele.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-looking-for-financing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-looking-for-financing/</link>
	<description>personal blog of Aaron Mentele, web developer and partner at Electric Pulp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 04:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mentele</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-looking-for-financing/comment-page-1/#comment-9273</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-looking-for-financing/#comment-9273</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  Wikipedia is a &quot;failing&quot; business that I&#039;d be more than happy to buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  Wikipedia is a &#8220;failing&#8221; business that I&#8217;d be more than happy to buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deane</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-looking-for-financing/comment-page-1/#comment-9263</link>
		<dc:creator>Deane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-looking-for-financing/#comment-9263</guid>
		<description>The financial sleeping giant of Wikipedia is advertising.  It&#039;s been discussed before, and it&#039;s been estimated a comprehensive advertising deal for the site would be worth $100 million or more per year.

Remember too that there are different classes of ads.  Wikipedia might end up like NPR, where certain sections are &quot;sponsored&quot; by certain companies, which no call to action, just a logo, a name, and a URL.  That alone would easily bring in enough to keep the servers running for centuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The financial sleeping giant of Wikipedia is advertising.  It&#8217;s been discussed before, and it&#8217;s been estimated a comprehensive advertising deal for the site would be worth $100 million or more per year.</p>
<p>Remember too that there are different classes of ads.  Wikipedia might end up like NPR, where certain sections are &#8220;sponsored&#8221; by certain companies, which no call to action, just a logo, a name, and a URL.  That alone would easily bring in enough to keep the servers running for centuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

