<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: truemors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronmentele.com/2007/05/16/truemors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/05/16/truemors/</link>
	<description>personal blog of Aaron Mentele, web developer and partner at Electric Pulp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:51:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mentele</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/05/16/truemors/comment-page-1/#comment-14360</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/05/16/truemors/#comment-14360</guid>
		<description>Hey Tony.  Akismet caught your comment too (dammit.) 

I&#039;m not interested in one-line, unverified rumors about Paris Hilton, so my interest comes more from the crowdsourcing aspects - volume of posts, authority factors, etc.  Day 1 was mobsourcing.  That was something else.

Truemors will continue to evolve and mature as posting &quot;rules&quot; get layered in and the technology continues to become more sophisticated.  The mob will tire of blurting.  The value of content will increase.  But that won&#039;t necessarily make it more interesting to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tony.  Akismet caught your comment too (dammit.) </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not interested in one-line, unverified rumors about Paris Hilton, so my interest comes more from the crowdsourcing aspects &#8211; volume of posts, authority factors, etc.  Day 1 was mobsourcing.  That was something else.</p>
<p>Truemors will continue to evolve and mature as posting &#8220;rules&#8221; get layered in and the technology continues to become more sophisticated.  The mob will tire of blurting.  The value of content will increase.  But that won&#8217;t necessarily make it more interesting to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mentele</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/05/16/truemors/comment-page-1/#comment-14357</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 07:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/05/16/truemors/#comment-14357</guid>
		<description>Hi (again) JD.  Akismet caught your question regarding advertising.  I&#039;ve been a bystander only in the ad revenue conversations.  It has the potential to be a significant source of revenue, though.  

I&#039;m, personally, not big on surrounding content with contextual advertising and calling it a business plan.  I&#039;d rather focus on getting the service right early, monetizing it late.  I had a different opinion a year ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi (again) JD.  Akismet caught your question regarding advertising.  I&#8217;ve been a bystander only in the ad revenue conversations.  It has the potential to be a significant source of revenue, though.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m, personally, not big on surrounding content with contextual advertising and calling it a business plan.  I&#8217;d rather focus on getting the service right early, monetizing it late.  I had a different opinion a year ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mentele</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/05/16/truemors/comment-page-1/#comment-14292</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 06:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/05/16/truemors/#comment-14292</guid>
		<description>Hey JD.  You&#039;re right - ajax would make for a nicer refresh.  You&#039;re also right with your answer - the current rev was a relatively quick project with most of our time going into the posting mechanisms.  We&#039;re still circling back on a number of items (partially out of vanity.) The list just has a way of growing faster than it shrinks.

You really need to stop by sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey JD.  You&#8217;re right &#8211; ajax would make for a nicer refresh.  You&#8217;re also right with your answer &#8211; the current rev was a relatively quick project with most of our time going into the posting mechanisms.  We&#8217;re still circling back on a number of items (partially out of vanity.) The list just has a way of growing faster than it shrinks.</p>
<p>You really need to stop by sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdbartlett</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/05/16/truemors/comment-page-1/#comment-14284</link>
		<dc:creator>jdbartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 03:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/05/16/truemors/#comment-14284</guid>
		<description>Speaking of the unmattering technology, I&#039;m kinda curious--and suspect the answer is probably very practical and involves things like deadlines and budgets--why Truemors prefers an ol&#039; fashioned page refresh timeout over Ajaxian magic like Prototype&#039;s Ajax.PeriodicalUpdater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of the unmattering technology, I&#8217;m kinda curious&#8211;and suspect the answer is probably very practical and involves things like deadlines and budgets&#8211;why Truemors prefers an ol&#8217; fashioned page refresh timeout over Ajaxian magic like Prototype&#8217;s Ajax.PeriodicalUpdater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdbartlett</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/05/16/truemors/comment-page-1/#comment-14283</link>
		<dc:creator>jdbartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 02:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/05/16/truemors/#comment-14283</guid>
		<description>Recapping your SXSW experience, you doubted the business models that run some Web 2.0 services.  I&#039;m curious, was advertising/sponsorship intended as a true business model for Truemors, or just a way to support the cost of hosting, etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recapping your SXSW experience, you doubted the business models that run some Web 2.0 services.  I&#8217;m curious, was advertising/sponsorship intended as a true business model for Truemors, or just a way to support the cost of hosting, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mentele</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/05/16/truemors/comment-page-1/#comment-14248</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/05/16/truemors/#comment-14248</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andy.  Those are corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andy.  Those are corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/05/16/truemors/comment-page-1/#comment-14240</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 12:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/05/16/truemors/#comment-14240</guid>
		<description>Aaron, you should really be careful about all those Feedburner redirect links. 4 of the link above are currently to Feedburner redirects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, you should really be careful about all those Feedburner redirect links. 4 of the link above are currently to Feedburner redirects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hung</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/05/16/truemors/comment-page-1/#comment-14239</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 11:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/05/16/truemors/#comment-14239</guid>
		<description>Wait -- its interesting *because* its an unmoderated free-for-all?

Sorry dude, I just don&#039;t buy that.

A constant state of entropy would exactly be the kind of mess that all social *anythings* try and avoid, from BBS&#039;s all the way up to Digg.

I agree -- it will be important to see what&#039;s left after it dies down, but if there are no future intentions to place rules to prevent spamming / gaming / flaming / trolling to *encourage* a useful community then, you are right about one thing.

Celebrity won&#039;t mean a thing.

tony @ dji</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait &#8212; its interesting *because* its an unmoderated free-for-all?</p>
<p>Sorry dude, I just don&#8217;t buy that.</p>
<p>A constant state of entropy would exactly be the kind of mess that all social *anythings* try and avoid, from BBS&#8217;s all the way up to Digg.</p>
<p>I agree &#8212; it will be important to see what&#8217;s left after it dies down, but if there are no future intentions to place rules to prevent spamming / gaming / flaming / trolling to *encourage* a useful community then, you are right about one thing.</p>
<p>Celebrity won&#8217;t mean a thing.</p>
<p>tony @ dji</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
