<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backchannel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronmentele.com/2009/02/12/backchannel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2009/02/12/backchannel/</link>
	<description>personal blog of Aaron Mentele, web developer and partner at Electric Pulp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 04:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2009/02/12/backchannel/comment-page-1/#comment-36943</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronmentele.com/?p=647#comment-36943</guid>
		<description>I have always felt people spend too much time competing on a personal level than competing against the game.  If the game has size and you are a top player, there should be ample size for everyone.  

Interesting development in our business - PPC marketing.  It is only shared by a very small group as most are too greedy, do not see the big picture, or are just afraid of trusting anyone (that may be the primary), or have never seen sizable success to be able to handle the massive swings...team with other guys (say 3), share each others programs that are making money and have a gentleman&#039;s agreement to now get the #1-#3 listings (one each in arranged order).  At least now you know who you are competing against (working with) and costs can better be aligned as well.  Cuts research, testing and click costs for all and the group gets more pie - cash pie in this case.

I can tell you this right now in our business, the swings are more massive than I have ever seen.  We have $10,000 revenue days that can swing to $3,000 the next day.  Same on the flip side.  And since July 2008, we have lost at least 8 - $100,000 a year campaigns (2 over $500,000 each) only to replace and lose some again.  Each day I am optimistic yet have a 3 minute &quot;what could have been&quot; moment - is that greed, successful desires, or just normal anymore.  I think 2010 will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always felt people spend too much time competing on a personal level than competing against the game.  If the game has size and you are a top player, there should be ample size for everyone.  </p>
<p>Interesting development in our business &#8211; PPC marketing.  It is only shared by a very small group as most are too greedy, do not see the big picture, or are just afraid of trusting anyone (that may be the primary), or have never seen sizable success to be able to handle the massive swings&#8230;team with other guys (say 3), share each others programs that are making money and have a gentleman&#8217;s agreement to now get the #1-#3 listings (one each in arranged order).  At least now you know who you are competing against (working with) and costs can better be aligned as well.  Cuts research, testing and click costs for all and the group gets more pie &#8211; cash pie in this case.</p>
<p>I can tell you this right now in our business, the swings are more massive than I have ever seen.  We have $10,000 revenue days that can swing to $3,000 the next day.  Same on the flip side.  And since July 2008, we have lost at least 8 &#8211; $100,000 a year campaigns (2 over $500,000 each) only to replace and lose some again.  Each day I am optimistic yet have a 3 minute &#8220;what could have been&#8221; moment &#8211; is that greed, successful desires, or just normal anymore.  I think 2010 will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2009/02/12/backchannel/comment-page-1/#comment-36941</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronmentele.com/?p=647#comment-36941</guid>
		<description>We should form a union: United Personhood of Web Workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should form a union: United Personhood of Web Workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Stokes</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2009/02/12/backchannel/comment-page-1/#comment-36940</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Stokes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronmentele.com/?p=647#comment-36940</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea Aaron.  While building a solution would be a simple and fun (nerd alert) task, I still think ego would get in the way of it being used as intended... Might be fun to do anyhow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea Aaron.  While building a solution would be a simple and fun (nerd alert) task, I still think ego would get in the way of it being used as intended&#8230; Might be fun to do anyhow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mentele</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2009/02/12/backchannel/comment-page-1/#comment-36939</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronmentele.com/?p=647#comment-36939</guid>
		<description>@Deane - clearly not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deane &#8211; clearly not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deane</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2009/02/12/backchannel/comment-page-1/#comment-36936</link>
		<dc:creator>Deane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronmentele.com/?p=647#comment-36936</guid>
		<description>You and I don&#039;t have this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and I don&#8217;t have this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

