<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aaron Mentele, Charisma 18 &#187; api</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronmentele.com/tag/api/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronmentele.com</link>
	<description>personal blog of Aaron Mentele, web developer and partner at Electric Pulp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>By &#8220;open,&#8221; we mean more open than facebook</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/11/01/by-open-we-mean-more-open-than-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/11/01/by-open-we-mean-more-open-than-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/11/01/by-open-we-mean-more-open-than-facebook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday served as a quick reminder to the world that Google&#8217;s still a bit cooler than facebook.  (Generally speaking, of course.)
With Open Social, the Goog is making a clear play at platform developers by using words like open and standards.  According to TechCrunch, the API adapter&#8217;s specific aim is to give developers access [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday served as a quick reminder to the world that Google&#8217;s still a bit cooler than facebook.  (Generally speaking, of course.)</p>
<p>With Open Social, the Goog is making a clear play at platform developers by using words like <em>open</em> and <em>standards</em>.  <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/30/details-revealed-google-opensocial-to-be-common-apis-for-building-social-apps/">According to TechCrunch</a>, the API adapter&#8217;s specific aim is to give developers access to profile, friend and activity information across multiple platforms (Ning, LinkedIn, Hi5, Friendster, Salesforce.com, Oracle, iLike, Flixster, RockYou, and Slide.)  I like to think it&#8217;s general aim is to scare facebook.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still in the &#8220;look at the shiny bits&#8221; camp.  Being able to develop apps in standard languages that work outside of container platforms is a past-due condition.  It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t like the idea of having to learn FBML to build a proper facebook app, or the idea that doing so locks me into a proprietary platform&#8230;  Er, wait.  It is that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll wait until the official announcement and then a clear motivation to build inside Open Social before I step back to consider that all of this information we&#8217;re now able to access will be flowing through the Google tunnel.  (These guys are clever.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m posting this a day after writing, so if you&#8217;d like to catch up on the run-away topic, <a href="http://www.brianoberkirch.com/2007/11/01/open-open-open/">Brian Oberkirch has links to more</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/11/01/by-open-we-mean-more-open-than-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
