<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aaron Mentele, Charisma 18 &#187; html css relative fixed width</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronmentele.com/tag/html-css-relative-fixed-width/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronmentele.com</link>
	<description>personal blog of Aaron Mentele, web developer and partner at Electric Pulp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Relative things</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2009/06/18/relative-things/</link>
		<comments>http://aaronmentele.com/2009/06/18/relative-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html css relative fixed width]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronmentele.com/?p=776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for further elaboration on the topic of My Opinion Regarding Website Sizing Relative To Viewport. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a Team Page Zoom &#8211; you&#8217;ll have to forgive my previous title. And if there was, membership would not require taking an oath to make sites fixed width, fixed font size, or fixed anything. 
My [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for further elaboration on the topic of <strong>My Opinion Regarding Website Sizing Relative To Viewport</strong>. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a Team Page Zoom &#8211; you&#8217;ll have to forgive my previous title. And if there was, membership would not require taking an oath to make sites fixed width, fixed font size, or fixed anything. </p>
<p>My point is that there are drawbacks to flexible layouts just as there are to fixed layouts. My specific issue with the former is that developers effectively need to produce larger sites than are being delivered. It strikes me as wasteful to increase the size of all requests for all users in the name of flexibility. My specific issue with the latter is that you can&#8217;t change the magnification at all without browser support.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone has really picked a side, a team, or even a standard methodology regardless of the amount of skepticism voiced. If you&#8217;re interested in the topic, though, you should check out <a href="http://allinthehead.com/retro/343/the-fallacy-of-page-zooming">Drew Mclellan&#8217;s recent post</a>. Be sure to follow the link through to <a href="http://cameronmoll.com/archives/2009/06/coding_like_its_1999/">Cameron Moll&#8217;s</a> post as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aaronmentele.com/2009/06/18/relative-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
