<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aaron Mentele &#187; microformats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaronmentele.com/tag/microformats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaronmentele.com</link>
	<description>personal blog of Aaron Mentele, web developer and partner at Electric Pulp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Content recommendations c/o your decentralized social network</title>
		<link>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/12/07/content-recommendations-co-your-decentralized-social-network/</link>
		<comments>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/12/07/content-recommendations-co-your-decentralized-social-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mentele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dataportability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microformats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portablesocialnetworks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charisma18.com/2007/12/07/content-recommendations-co-your-decentralized-social-network/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s ignore all the reasons you don&#8217;t need another social network and say that you do. And since we&#8217;re hypothesizing, I should tell you you are a content provider. It shouldn&#8217;t be too much of a stretch. Every [new media] publisher I know already thinks this way. Social networks are a great way to build [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s ignore all the reasons you don&#8217;t need another social network and say that you do.  And since we&#8217;re hypothesizing, I should tell you <em>you</em> are a content provider.</p>
<p>It shouldn&#8217;t be too much of a stretch.  Every [new media] publisher I know already thinks this way.  Social networks are a great way to build community, so every content provider can benefit from all the features of a social network.  Right?</p>
<p>By default, I don&#8217;t buy it.  But there are cases where site visitors would benefit from the content recommendations of friends. That&#8217;s one example.</p>
<p>To get the content recommendations of friends, you need friends.  And to get friends, you need a social network.  Right?</p>
<h4>Err&#8230;</h4>
<p>The success of a social network (bolt-on or otherwise) depends on members getting past the set up.  Visitors need to register, elaborate, personalize, search for friends, request authorization from friends, authorize friends, and repeat.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a lot of work to go through to be able to recommend content on one site.</p>
<h4>Here&#8217;s a better way to handle this</h4>
<p>Let the social network travel with the member rather than require them to garden yet another walled social network.</p>
<p><a href="http://openid.net/">OpenID</a> handles identity, kind of.  Today, it&#8217;s more like <em>sign-up</em>, but it could handle a hell of a lot more.  Like who I consider a friend, which communities I&#8217;m part of, and what content I find interesting for starters.</p>
<p>In other words, the member would own the community activities versus the reverse (the community owning the member activities).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not so crazy to imagine.  Each time OpenID jumps you past the registration for a site, it could store the community as a record inside your [decentralized] account.  OpenID could also store records of your friends.  And records of content chunks (form of a content id) you like.</p>
<p>From that data, you&#8217;d be able to share content with friends at any community / site you frequent.  Providing, of course, that your friend(s) frequent the community / site as well.</p>
<p>OpenID won&#8217;t be implementing this anytime soon.  But it would be very straightforward to build a companion app that lets you organize your communities, friends, and the content you find interesting (more later on why this isn&#8217;t a privacy concern).</p>
<p>A few adjustments at each site (authentication / <a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/data-portability">markup</a>) and the content provider would be able to provide visitors with the content recommendations of their friends.  Again, one example.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brianoberkirch.com/category/portablesocialnetworks/">Portable social networks are good</a>.  In whatever form they take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aaronmentele.com/2007/12/07/content-recommendations-co-your-decentralized-social-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

